<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: display: inline-block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.qasimalyas.co.uk/display-inline-block/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.qasimalyas.co.uk/display-inline-block/</link>
	<description>A place to hone my web development skills and to blog about anything interesting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: q.alyas</title>
		<link>http://www.qasimalyas.co.uk/display-inline-block/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>q.alyas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://193.189.74.95/~qasimaly//?p=283#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I for one wasn&#039;t aware of this until Firefox 3 was released and I honestly didn&#039;t bother that much keeping up with specs. Since then I&#039;ve been keeping a close eye on the css3 spec and testing any new css3 features on the nightly releases for firefox and safari. 

I&#039;ve used &lt;code&gt;display: inline-block&lt;/code&gt; on personal projects  for form labels, buttons and just this morning applied the style to fix a bug.  Without the &lt;code&gt;display: inline-block&lt;/code&gt; I would&#039;ve had to write 2-3 lines of css code and we all know less is better!

Firefox 2 was a great browser in it&#039;s time but people have to start upgrading if they want a better web experience but the problem is that they don&#039;t know they can have that unless someone tells them.  For that I reason I strongly believe that we, designers and developers&#039; have to take the initiative and have some sort of display message on page load telling users to upgrade - much like the one running on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one wasn&#8217;t aware of this until Firefox 3 was released and I honestly didn&#8217;t bother that much keeping up with specs. Since then I&#8217;ve been keeping a close eye on the css3 spec and testing any new css3 features on the nightly releases for firefox and safari. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used <code>display: inline-block</code> on personal projects  for form labels, buttons and just this morning applied the style to fix a bug.  Without the <code>display: inline-block</code> I would&#8217;ve had to write 2-3 lines of css code and we all know less is better!</p>
<p>Firefox 2 was a great browser in it&#8217;s time but people have to start upgrading if they want a better web experience but the problem is that they don&#8217;t know they can have that unless someone tells them.  For that I reason I strongly believe that we, designers and developers&#8217; have to take the initiative and have some sort of display message on page load telling users to upgrade &#8211; much like the one running on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://www.qasimalyas.co.uk/display-inline-block/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://193.189.74.95/~qasimaly//?p=283#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Neat trick!

I noticed something similar on our templates but it used classes a bit more...and I sort of prefer that (even though it isn&#039;t as semantic).

Reason being that whilst we can use conditional comments to include / exclude HTML or CSS hacks for IE there&#039;s no way to target a specific Firefox, and what&#039;s the score with Firefox 3 and the -moz prefix? I&#039;d expect it to work in the same way but is it a hack for a non-problem?

We can always do that server side and to be honest I don&#039;t know why it was a problem for &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; site. I will ask why it was not allowed, presumably for performances reasons but I can&#039;t work out what that would be. Will have to ask.

Will definitely consider it for future sites though. It&#039;s a solution for a common problem and CSS problems should be solved with CSS not by chucking more classes at an element :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neat trick!</p>
<p>I noticed something similar on our templates but it used classes a bit more&#8230;and I sort of prefer that (even though it isn&#8217;t as semantic).</p>
<p>Reason being that whilst we can use conditional comments to include / exclude HTML or CSS hacks for IE there&#8217;s no way to target a specific Firefox, and what&#8217;s the score with Firefox 3 and the -moz prefix? I&#8217;d expect it to work in the same way but is it a hack for a non-problem?</p>
<p>We can always do that server side and to be honest I don&#8217;t know why it was a problem for <em>that</em> site. I will ask why it was not allowed, presumably for performances reasons but I can&#8217;t work out what that would be. Will have to ask.</p>
<p>Will definitely consider it for future sites though. It&#8217;s a solution for a common problem and CSS problems should be solved with CSS not by chucking more classes at an element <img src='http://www.qasimalyas.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
